0.03/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.11/0.16 % Command : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC 0.16/0.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu 0.16/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.16/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.16/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.16/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.16/0.37 % CPULimit : 1200 0.16/0.37 % WCLimit : 120 0.16/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 15:20:19 EDT 2021 0.16/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.37 % Number of cores: 8 0.16/0.37 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.16/0.38 # Version: 2.6rc1-ho 0.16/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied 0.16/0.39 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 2.67/2.86 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y 2.67/2.86 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. 2.67/2.86 # 2.67/2.86 # Preprocessing time : 2.439 s 2.67/2.86 2.67/2.86 # Proof found! 2.67/2.86 # SZS status Theorem 2.67/2.86 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 2.67/2.86 thf(fact_240_inputIneqTrans, axiom, ![X2:name, X29:name, X1:pi, X57:late_subject, X58:name, X4:pi]:(late_transitions @ (input @ X2 @ X29 @ X1) @ (late_BoundR @ X57 @ X58 @ X4)=>~(fresh_717452603ubject @ X2 @ X57)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_240_inputIneqTrans)). 2.67/2.86 thf(fact_149_subject_Oexhaust, axiom, ![X177:late_subject]:(~(![X178:name]:(X177)!=(late_BoundOutputS @ X178))<=![X179:name]:(X177)!=(late_InputS @ X179)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_149_subject_Oexhaust)). 2.67/2.86 thf(fact_237_Late__Semantics_OInput, axiom, ![X2:name, X29:name, X1:pi]:late_transitions @ (input @ X2 @ X29 @ X1) @ (late_BoundR @ (late_InputS @ X2) @ X29 @ X1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_237_Late__Semantics_OInput)). 2.67/2.86 thf(fact_101_freshBoundDerivative_I1_J, axiom, ![X1:pi, X199:late_subject, X29:name, X4:pi, X200:name]:((fresh_name_pi @ X200 @ X1=>fresh_717452603ubject @ X200 @ X199)<=late_transitions @ X1 @ (late_BoundR @ X199 @ X29 @ X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_101_freshBoundDerivative_I1_J)). 2.67/2.86 thf(conj_0, conjecture, (x)!=(aa), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)). 2.67/2.86 thf(fact_73_Late__Semantics1_Osubject_Oinject_I1_J, axiom, ![X17:name, X348:name]:((late_InputS @ X17)=(late_InputS @ X348)<=>(X17)=(X348)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_73_Late__Semantics1_Osubject_Oinject_I1_J)). 2.67/2.86 thf(fact_8_cClose1_Ohyps_I1_J, axiom, late_transitions @ p @ (late_BoundR @ (late_InputS @ aa) @ y @ p2), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_8_cClose1_Ohyps_I1_J)). 2.67/2.86 thf(fact_42_Late__Semantics_Osubject_Odistinct_I1_J, axiom, ![X223:name, X153:name]:(late_InputS @ X223)!=(late_BoundOutputS @ X153), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_42_Late__Semantics_Osubject_Odistinct_I1_J)). 2.67/2.86 thf(fact_3_assms_I1_J, axiom, fresh_name_pi @ x @ p, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_3_assms_I1_J)). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X2:name, X29:name, X1:pi, X57:late_subject, X58:name, X4:pi]:(late_transitions @ (input @ X2 @ X29 @ X1) @ (late_BoundR @ X57 @ X58 @ X4)=>~fresh_717452603ubject @ X2 @ X57), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_240_inputIneqTrans])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X177:late_subject]:(![X179:name]:(X177)!=(late_InputS @ X179)=>~(![X178:name]:(X177)!=(late_BoundOutputS @ X178))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_149_subject_Oexhaust])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X2335:name, X2336:name, X2337:pi, X2338:late_subject, X2339:name, X2340:pi]:(~late_transitions @ (input @ X2335 @ X2336 @ X2337) @ (late_BoundR @ X2338 @ X2339 @ X2340)|~fresh_717452603ubject @ X2335 @ X2338), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X3268:name, X3269:name, X3270:pi]:late_transitions @ (input @ X3268 @ X3269 @ X3270) @ (late_BoundR @ (late_InputS @ X3268) @ X3269 @ X3270), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_237_Late__Semantics_OInput])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X1:pi, X199:late_subject, X29:name, X4:pi, X200:name]:(late_transitions @ X1 @ (late_BoundR @ X199 @ X29 @ X4)=>(fresh_name_pi @ X200 @ X1=>fresh_717452603ubject @ X200 @ X199)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_101_freshBoundDerivative_I1_J])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (x)=(aa), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_15, plain, ![X3182:name, X3183:name]:(((late_InputS @ X3182)!=(late_InputS @ X3183)|(X3182)=(X3183))&((X3182)!=(X3183)|(late_InputS @ X3182)=(late_InputS @ X3183))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_73_Late__Semantics1_Osubject_Oinject_I1_J])])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X2655:late_subject]:((X2655)=(late_InputS @ (esk133_1 @ X2655))|(X2655)=(late_BoundOutputS @ (esk134_1 @ X2655))), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X6:name, X1:pi, X3:name, X2:name, X4:pi, X11:late_subject]:(~late_transitions @ (input @ X2 @ X3 @ X1) @ (late_BoundR @ X11 @ X6 @ X4)|~fresh_717452603ubject @ X2 @ X11), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X3:name, X2:name, X1:pi]:late_transitions @ (input @ X2 @ X3 @ X1) @ (late_BoundR @ (late_InputS @ X2) @ X3 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X2702:pi, X2703:late_subject, X2704:name, X2705:pi, X2706:name]:(~late_transitions @ X2702 @ (late_BoundR @ X2703 @ X2704 @ X2705)|(~fresh_name_pi @ X2706 @ X2702|fresh_717452603ubject @ X2706 @ X2703)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_20, plain, late_transitions @ p @ (late_BoundR @ (late_InputS @ aa) @ y @ p2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_8_cClose1_Ohyps_I1_J])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (x)=(aa), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_22, plain, ![X2:name, X3:name]:((X2)=(X3)|(late_InputS @ X2)!=(late_InputS @ X3)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X11:late_subject]:((X11)=(late_InputS @ (esk133_1 @ X11))|(X11)=(late_BoundOutputS @ (esk134_1 @ X11))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_24, plain, ![X2905:name, X2906:name]:(late_InputS @ X2905)!=(late_BoundOutputS @ X2906), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_42_Late__Semantics_Osubject_Odistinct_I1_J])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X2:name]:~fresh_717452603ubject @ X2 @ (late_InputS @ X2), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_26, plain, ![X11:late_subject, X4:pi, X3:name, X2:name, X1:pi]:(fresh_717452603ubject @ X3 @ X11|~late_transitions @ X1 @ (late_BoundR @ X11 @ X2 @ X4)|~fresh_name_pi @ X3 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_27, plain, late_transitions @ p @ (late_BoundR @ (late_InputS @ x) @ y @ p2), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_28, plain, ![X11:late_subject, X2:name]:((late_BoundOutputS @ (esk134_1 @ X11))=(X11)|(esk133_1 @ X11)=(X2)|(X11)!=(late_InputS @ X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_29, plain, ![X2:name, X3:name]:(late_InputS @ X2)!=(late_BoundOutputS @ X3), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_30, plain, ![X11:late_subject]:((late_BoundOutputS @ (esk134_1 @ X11))=(X11)|~fresh_717452603ubject @ (esk133_1 @ X11) @ X11), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_23])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_31, plain, ![X2:name]:(fresh_717452603ubject @ X2 @ (late_InputS @ x)|~fresh_name_pi @ X2 @ p), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_32, plain, ![X2:name]:(esk133_1 @ (late_InputS @ X2))=(X2), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]), c_0_29])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_33, plain, fresh_name_pi @ x @ p, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_3_assms_I1_J])). 2.67/2.86 thf(c_0_34, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_31]), c_0_32]), c_0_33])]), c_0_29]), ['proof']). 2.67/2.86 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 2.67/2.86 # Proof object total steps : 35 2.67/2.86 # Proof object clause steps : 16 2.67/2.86 # Proof object formula steps : 19 2.67/2.86 # Proof object conjectures : 3 2.67/2.86 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1 2.67/2.86 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2 2.67/2.86 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9 2.67/2.86 # Proof object initial formulas used : 9 2.67/2.86 # Proof object generating inferences : 6 2.67/2.86 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6 2.67/2.86 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 2.67/2.86 # Parsed axioms : 430 2.67/2.86 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 2.67/2.86 # Initial clauses : 28666 2.67/2.86 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 139 2.67/2.86 # Initial clauses in saturation : 28527 2.67/2.86 # Processed clauses : 745 2.67/2.86 # ...of these trivial : 13 2.67/2.86 # ...subsumed : 195 2.67/2.86 # ...remaining for further processing : 537 2.67/2.86 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 97 2.67/2.86 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 2.67/2.86 # Backward-subsumed : 0 2.67/2.86 # Backward-rewritten : 23 2.67/2.86 # Generated clauses : 1699 2.67/2.86 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1292 2.67/2.86 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 2.67/2.86 # Paramodulations : 1267 2.67/2.86 # Factorizations : 2 2.67/2.86 # NegExts : 19 2.67/2.86 # Equation resolutions : 186 2.67/2.86 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 2.67/2.86 # Propositional check models : 0 2.67/2.86 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 2.67/2.86 # Propositional clauses : 0 2.67/2.86 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 2.67/2.86 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 2.67/2.86 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 2.67/2.86 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 2.67/2.86 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 2.67/2.86 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 2.67/2.86 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 2.67/2.86 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 2.67/2.86 # Current number of processed clauses : 503 2.67/2.86 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 147 2.67/2.86 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1 2.67/2.86 # Negative unit clauses : 73 2.67/2.86 # Non-unit-clauses : 282 2.67/2.86 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 29030 2.67/2.86 # ...number of literals in the above : 307819 2.67/2.86 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 2.67/2.86 # Current number of archived clauses : 23 2.67/2.86 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17116 2.67/2.86 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14296 2.67/2.86 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 126 2.67/2.86 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3889 2.67/2.86 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 18 2.67/2.86 # BW rewrite match attempts : 196 2.67/2.86 # BW rewrite match successes : 16 2.67/2.86 # Condensation attempts : 745 2.67/2.86 # Condensation successes : 2 2.67/2.86 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2899832 2.67/2.87 2.67/2.87 # ------------------------------------------------- 2.67/2.87 # User time : 2.429 s 2.67/2.87 # System time : 0.068 s 2.67/2.87 # Total time : 2.497 s 2.67/2.87 # Maximum resident set size: 2712 pages 2.67/2.87 EOF